[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Electric PSUB



Thanks for your reply
 
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:41 PM
Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Electric PSUB

Michael,
 
You made a good start with R/Csubs and reading. I shall give some awnsers an commets to your questions.
At the list is steel the material of choise for reliability and ageing reson
Book has arrived: "Concepts in Submarine Design" by "Roy Burcher and Louis Rydill"
 

1 man
60m operating depth
100m crush depth MAX (where I will run it (fresh water) won't be deeper than that) 
[Emile D.L.van Essen]  for these depths a safety factor of 2+ is common 
I read that x2 was the safty factor, but as I said the place where it will be run isn't deeper than 100m and I doubt it is even that.
1 ATM 
Fast
[Emile D.L.van Essen]  Why?  
Purely fun :-)
Electric
Cheap as possible
'Trailerable'
No compressed air/CO2 absorbants
[Emile D.L.van Essen] Ballast control should be done with compressed air. A life support system is easyer and cheaper than yoiu think.  
It wasn't really the cost I was thinking about in this case. I don't have the ability to buy/have refilled large tanks of compressed air. And as I said later on I would prefer to use dynamic diving - mainly safety reasons but there are others.
Inside I want a seat, can't be doing with lying on my front.
Ideally 1 man operation for in/out the water - (Think that's all)
 
 
It needs to be as cheap as possible, however obviously I don't want to endanger my life. So I was thinking about CCTV cameras on the outside in pressure housing, with a array of monitors on the inside. Any thoughts? Things I thought about : Increased temperature and battery draw. This would however, allow me to bypass the acrylic dome aspect.
[Emile D.L.van Essen]  I can help you with a dome (580 mm O.D. @ 30 mm thick) The view is worth it!  
I was thinking about the construction time/effort cost etc, and it seemed that getting a dome that large would cost quite abit. I also thought that with a hi-res colour camera on the outside and a large(ish) screen on the inside it would do just as well. No idea how well, just guessing.  
 
Propulsion. I have a 2HP (36V) electric motor left over from another project, now would this be enough to propel me through the water at a reasonable speed? Not sure if you call it dynamic diving (use of hydroplanes to dive) but that is what I was thinking and so will need some speed.
[Emile D.L.van Essen] You can make a R/C sub slightly buoyant and you can dibe dynamic. A psub need freeboard . Ballast tanks should have 20-30 % boats volume; that dont dive with 2 HP.
As I've only sailed a couple of times 2 years ago I'm unfamilar with terms. What does 'freeboard' mean? 
 
The other thing that I always try to aim for when I made subs in the past, was to make battery power the only limiting factor. So things like CO2 absorbant/air scrubbers need to be 'bypassed'. I was thinking about changing the air every 10? minutes so as to eliminate this problem (open hatch, nothing fancy). Anyone see a problem with this?[Emile D.L.van Essen]  As said, a LSS is not so difficult but a internal space of 500 liter gives a safe dive time of 1/2 hour. You can use dive gear for emergency.  
Although I'm not suba qualified I do have a Royal Navy Submarine Escape Immersion/Survival Suit that I guess I could use. I take it 500litres is on top of items in the sub? 
 
Groet, Emile
 
Thanks Again,
 
Michael