|
Oh so sorry Jeff, I thought this was a discussion group, my mistake. Discussing and arguing some times look similar. I think of discussing as being a positive experience that generally results in one of more persons involved learning some thing new. I think of arguing as being a very negative experience. Besides not responding to someone's reason(s) they believe some thing will or will not work, how can I make this a more positive experience for you? Having to defend and/or explain ones ideas is a useful learning process. If some one believes they might have a way solve to a problem presented to them, they I believe, should present it for group review, if they are really interested in solving the puzzle(s). The back and forth discussion(s) can be short lived or very long, depending on the complexity and interest in the subject matter. Regards, Brent Hartwig Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:23:07 -0400 From: ss.nemrod@gmail.com To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Restoring a Biber (or Beaver) midget submarine Brent,
What part of deadly do you not understand? No one in their right mind would go out in a Biber today! You might find someone interested in discussing Bibers over on the new Yahoo group: Crackpot_Sub_Designs. You don't want to listen to anyone hear. Suggests you talk with someone in the marine trades concerning metal surface preparation. Have never heard of copper slag blasting material being used in this field. Copper + Iron + Seawater = Galvanic Cell (i.e. pitting and crevice corrosion). Quit being so argumentative. Jeff On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 3:00 PM, Brent Hartwig <brenthartwig@hotmail.com> wrote:
|