[PSUBS-MAILIST] (no subject)

hank pronk hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca
Fri Feb 7 20:57:40 EST 2014


Alan,
I think the weight of the cable will prevent feeling anything.  1,000 feet of cable, that is a long way!   Also the sub may come up on any old angle all the way from that depth, it might
 land in my driveway at home lol.

Vance,
Your starting to make me nervous :-)  I will send you the first picture of it back on the trailer.
Hank




On Friday, February 7, 2014 6:47:39 PM, Alan <alanlindsayjames at yahoo.com> wrote:
  
Your wife, Hank. Now there's a good option, does she know how
to operate the ballast valves?
If the cable started going slack you would know the sub was
coming up & could get out of the way. just keep tension on the line
with the boat & as long as there is an angle on the cable you won't get
hit.
Alan

Sent from my iPad

On 8/02/2014, at 1:33 pm, hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca> wrote:


Joe,
>My wife, (the brains of the operation)  says the same thing.  I have to agree, I can send it down on the cable and bring it up on the cable.  The auto pilot Alec sent me is a fantastic back up.  If there is a problem with the lifting system, I will just back away and wait.
>
>
>Hank
>
>
>
>On Friday, February 7, 2014 5:27:46 PM, Joe Perkel <josephperkel at yahoo.com> wrote:
>  
>Hank,
>
>
>What I don't like about deep water remote testing, is the fact that we are testing against the worst case scenario, a sub full of water. The good news of course being unmanned.
>
>
>Therefore to my mind we must be prepared for that worst case scenario, meaning being in the best possible position to recover the sub. That means heavy lifting doesn't it?
>
>
>Sending a grapple down a line requires 100% success in making contact, is that assured? I don't know I've never done it.
>
>
>So if I had the means to send it down on a cable, that's what I think I'd do.
>
>
>Joe
>
>
>
>
>On Feb 7, 2014, at 6:08 PM, hank pronk <hanker_20032000 at yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
>
>PROBLEM, now that I am getting Alec's auto pilot, I run the risk of the sub surfacing violently if it develops a leak and the water sensor tells the sub to surface.  If I have my steel barge above Gamma there could be a very serious collision.  The other option is to forget the barge and send Gamma down with a rope attached as a locator and a way to slide a cable down to retrieve it.  The rope only needs a rubber float to locate it.  I would put a second auto pilot in that relies on a battery going dead to make it surface with a separate hp source.
>>What to do hmmm
>>The other option is use the auto pilot from Alec without the water sensor and have the barge over Gamma with the cable between.  Then there is a safety if the cable fell off or what ever, and if the sub fills with water I can winch it up. 
>>Hmm , what do you guys think.
>>Hank
>_______________________________________________
>>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>    
_______________________________________________
>Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
>http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20140207/13ad58f4/attachment.html>


More information about the Personal_Submersibles mailing list