[PSUBS-MAILIST] correction

[T Novak via Personal_Submersibles]

Hi Hank,

Sounds like a good way to go.  Is your plan to restrict manned dives to 66% of the maximum unmanned test dive?  This would seem to be a good policy in general.  Is there a design fatigue life on the hull (i.e. so many cycles before overhaul)?

Tim

 

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: September-26-15 7:59 AM
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] correction

 

Hi Tim,

I have only been to 105 or 110 with you.  I will deep test Gamma with the pod as soon as it is back together.

Hank

 

 

On Saturday, September 26, 2015 8:46 AM, T Novak via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org <mailto:personal_submersibles at psubs.org> > wrote:

 

Hi Hank,

 

What has been the max test depth of Gamma itself with the dome so far?

 

Tim

 

From: Personal_Submersibles [mailto:personal_submersibles-bounces at psubs.org] On Behalf Of hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles
Sent: September-26-15 5:44 AM
To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org <mailto:personal_submersibles at psubs.org> >
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] correction

 

Hi All,

Correction, I estimated that the pod sank 800 feet based on the amount of rope left on the spool.  It actually sank 638 feet,  my target depth was 600 feet.  I will be diving at 400 feet for the next season.    

Hank

 

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org> 
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20150926/4b31f49e/attachment.html>