[PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL

[hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles]

 Scott,That makes sense.  You are certainly a member of a very exclusive group.  What is there, maybe 5 operating DSV's out there?  Hank
    On Friday, October 20, 2017, 6:49:43 PM MDT, Alan via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Scott,DNVGL considered my 500ft design as deep diving.Below is there response on this.Alan
No. 500ft is seen as a deep depth, where even tec-divers will have difficulties to reach without special preparations. 
96h additional life support is intended to enable rescue teams to arrive, find and reach the submersible as well to apply means for rescue of the submersible (if e.g. stucked or entangled, the pilot became unconscious, etc.)

Sent from my iPad
On 21/10/2017, at 1:26 PM, Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:



I have heard 2 things*2000m or more*Have the ballast use a high pressure pump.
But there isn't a law or anything so I guess anyone could call anything they like. Haha




Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> Date: 10/20/17 5:57 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL 
 What is the depth rating a sub needs to be to be considered a DSV?Hank
    On Friday, October 20, 2017, 3:57:54 PM MDT, Scott Waters via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:  
 
 Thanks Carsten,
We actually already have the rules and have been deep deep down the rabbit hole. Haha. There is some wording that does not jive with some of other parts as well as some things we are going to need acceptions on since we are a DSV and not a traditional submarine.
Thank you,Scott Waters


Sent from my U.S. Cellular® Smartphone
-------- Original message --------From: "MerlinSub at t-online.de via Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> Date: 10/20/17 12:51 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL 
Scott the rules are online : 

https://rules.dnvgl.com/ServiceDocuments/dnvgl/#!/industry/1/Maritime/5/DNV%20GL%20rules%20for%20classification:%20Underwater%20technology%20(RU-UWT)

No need to ask an inspector. 

vbr Carsten 



-----Original-Nachricht-----
Betreff: [PSUBS-MAILIST] DNVGL
Datum: 2017-10-20T19:26:21+0200
Von: "via Personal_Submersibles" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
An: "PSUBS" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>

Is there anyone on PSUBS that is familiar with DNVGL rules? We have some basic questions, but are trying not to consult an inspector for every question because of the cost. 

Thank you,
Scott 
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www..psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles


_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
  
_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20171021/bfa445ff/attachment-0001.html>