From: "Patrick" <pat_man_ta@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:11:11 -0400
One of the factors that has fueled my interest in subs has been the
inner/outer space aspect.
There's no realistic way for me to get into space and poke around at this
point.
There IS a realistic way for me to get undersea and poke around with some $
and some hard work.
Conclusion: build/obtain submarine
~patrick
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Cox
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History
Gene,
It seems to me it is a whole lot more interesting in "inner
space" than in outer space. I've thought of doing a short drift gondola
type sub with our current that is off our coast here. The current runs
about 2 to 4 knots.
Brian
----- Original Message -----
From: Gene Locke
To: PSUBS Mailing List
Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 19:01
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History
Hey Folks.
I've been on this list for so long I can't remember if I've ever
submitted before. Anyway, the important part of this is a
question/challenge.
I was researching the PX-15 project, the Benjamin Franklin, also known
as the Gulf Stream Drift Mission, and had a thought. Considering that
space exploration is once again taking off, so to speak, I find it
suprising that nobody has reviewed the whole undersea/space analog mission
template.
I'm a bit of a space nut as well as being into submarines, so maybe
I'm just seeing things from a different perspective. Seems to me that
revisting the mission model for the PX-15 could provide some valuable data
for both manned space flight and marine science.
Just wondered what everyone here thought of that.
Gene R. Locke
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.