[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History



Well put Patrick.

I mentioned once to another member precisely this point. Piloting a neutrally buoyant submersible with thrusters, is the closet an earthbound individual can ever come to maneuvering a spacecraft in zero g. That is off course, in a zero current condition, which would make say 'docking' somewhat tougher.

Add a night dive, in clear seawater on a calm day, maybe some phosphorescence to round out the experience.

Joe

From: "Patrick" <pat_man_ta@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org>
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History
Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 10:11:11 -0400

One of the factors that has fueled my interest in subs has been the inner/outer space aspect.

There's no realistic way for me to get into space and poke around at this point. There IS a realistic way for me to get undersea and poke around with some $ and some hard work.

Conclusion: build/obtain submarine

~patrick

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Brian Cox
  To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
  Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 1:41 AM
  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History


  Gene,
It seems to me it is a whole lot more interesting in "inner space" than in outer space. I've thought of doing a short drift gondola type sub with our current that is off our coast here. The current runs about 2 to 4 knots.

  Brian
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Gene Locke
    To: PSUBS Mailing List
    Sent: Wednesday, August 30, 2006 19:01
    Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Repeating History


    Hey Folks.

I've been on this list for so long I can't remember if I've ever submitted before. Anyway, the important part of this is a question/challenge.

I was researching the PX-15 project, the Benjamin Franklin, also known as the Gulf Stream Drift Mission, and had a thought. Considering that space exploration is once again taking off, so to speak, I find it suprising that nobody has reviewed the whole undersea/space analog mission template.

I'm a bit of a space nut as well as being into submarines, so maybe I'm just seeing things from a different perspective. Seems to me that revisting the mission model for the PX-15 could provide some valuable data for both manned space flight and marine science.

    Just wondered what everyone here thought of that.

    Gene R. Locke



----------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Stay in the know. Pulse on the new Yahoo.com. Check it out.





************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 311
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************