----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 5:51
AM
Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST]
Compressable ballast tanks
Hi fellas.
I was thinking about the variation in
buoyancy in my aluminum scuba tanks. You know when your tank starts to
get low on air how
it becomes more buoyant. A thought struck
me about how that might be counteracted that then led to another thought
concerning
ballast tanks for a sub. With the scuba
tank, I was thinking, what if it had a bottom that moved up and down the
length of the tank
like a piston in an engine. As the tank
emptied from my breathing, the bottom of the tank would be forced toward
the top of the tank
by the water pressure until the remaining
pressure in the tank stopped it from moving. In this way the rest of the
tank volume would
now be replaced by water and the tank
wouldn't get more buoyant as it emptied. Of course you would have to
have a very good
foolproof seal. Even perhaps a seal that
the tank's internal air pressure would push against to make the seal
tightly seal. I wonder
if anyone has ever tried making something
like that? That was my first idea. Then that thought made me think about
this. On my wetsub
I've been planning to install 6 or 8 inch
pipe about 4 feet long on either side for my soft ballast tanks. I had
planned to use two scuba tanks
to blow them and the scuba tanks would
each be attached to the top of the pipes on either side
of the sub providing plenty of air for both
the soft ballast pipes and also for the
hard ballast bladders in the bow and stern. What I was thinking about
was if I could use the same idea
as with the scuba tank moving bottom on my
soft ballast tanks. Suspose I had a piston with a really good
seal. Now I'm on the surface
with the soft ballast pipes full
volume keeping me up, then I could either crank the piston inward
or even use hydraulics to
push the piston inward. That would compress
the air in the soft ballast pipe and lower its volume and I
would submerge. Then when I wanted to
surface, I could crank the piston out,
allowing the air to expand, the volume to increase again, and then I
would surface. That way I wouldn't have
to use any air tanks to fill my soft ballast tanks. Sounds like it would work to me
but I'd have to make the pipe smooth and have a tight
fitting
piston with a really good seal on it. If
the seal ever blew out I could use my hard ballast tanks and my own
personal BCD and still get the sub to the
surface and I could also always bail out if
I had to. Just a thought about the variable volume scuba tank and
soft ballast tanks. What do you
fellows think?
Bill
Akins.