[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] call it a double hydro hull



Dean,
 
I would just be aching to find out more about the frozen aircraft carrier idea, but suspect you'd have to kill me so better not even ask. I once owned an old British sports car of the biodegradable kind. You know, the ones you gradually sweep up off the garage floor in the form of little red flakes. But the amount of maintenance that would be required to keep a sub that melts is too much even for me!
 
Back to the hull... The price of steel has gone up a lot in recent years, it's true. But even so, I can assure you the cost of the basic raw materials will be a relatively small component of the overall budget. It would be expensive if you ordered a finished hull with everything put together. But the components themselves are not so bad. I'd have to go fishing for receipts, and my prices would be way out of date by now anyway, but the order of magnitude is probably around $5K for a typical PSUB like a Kittredge design. What you'd get for that is a collection of plate rolled into cylinders for things like the hull, coning tower, and battery pods, endcaps, and some rings to weld in as stiffeners. The cylinders are rolled but will normally need a longitudinal weld. The cheapest and easiest sort of hull I can think of is the geometry in which the hull is made up of two endcaps welded together, like Cousteau's socoupe. There were some threads on that sort of design a few months ago.
 
If you want to visualize how this all looks, go to the PSUBS picture gallery and follow the link that says John Farrington. John seems to have dropped off the face of the earth, but his website is still up and is just a terrific step by step orientation.
 
 
thanks,

Alec


From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Recon1st@aol.com
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 3:29 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] call it a double hydro hull

In a message dated 10/18/2006 4:26:22 PM Central Daylight Time, Alec.Smyth@compuware.com writes:
Put on the comic book or sci fi writer hat. Make the double hulled sub, but FREEZE the water between the hulls. Throw away both the inner and outer hulls, otherwise known as molds. Now dress as a commando, approach an enemy shore on a suicide mission, and conceal your sub after landing by letting it melt. Or carry it with you and drink it. Hey, you wouldn't even need viewports
Alec you are right up my expertise here. I am a Marine Recon, (special forces)
No one heres much about us, as we have not gone hollywood like the fish eaters
(seals)
 
And don't think yer ice boat is comic book. There actually have been plans
to build even and aircraft carrier using this idea. As strange as it seems there
are real advantages.
 
As far as suicide missions, I will have to educate you. We never go on suicide
missions, we go on missions with veering degrees of expendability.
 
Now back to hulls. My thoughts were a cylindrical hull would be something
I would have to buy and it would be very expensive. Much more than me
welding my own up. I am a poor folk and can only spend about 20,000 on
my toy.
 
Are you suggesting I could buy a cylinder hull all made up and stay in
budget?
 
 I am looking at a max working depth of 400 ft (fresh water) and
 
ONe thing I know I need to do at this point is spend much time going
thru the archives, so I don't keep asking the questions you guys have
answered several times already.
a strong believer of big safety margins
 
Semper fi
Dean Ackman
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.