Hello Alec,  
  Your reminded me of one reason I didn't wish to go with air compensated thrusters. It was a slow bleed into the interior of a K-250 that George was running, that made the hatch dome pop out when he started to ascend, and he was lucky to of survived. This is also why I plan to install a over pressure valve much like the larger one that is installed on the KSS.  Except I'll be mounting mine in the bottom of the sub so it can also be used to drain the sub after a wet exit training exercise. 
 
 
  Regards, Szybowski
 
 
 
 
  Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side Thruster Options Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:14:20 -0400 From: Alec.Smyth@compuware.com To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
  
Hi Dan, 
  
I recall a past thread in the past on this topic, it 
must be in the archives. Mine were air compensated when I bought Snoopy but 
I switched to oil because the way the air compensation was originally 
implemented, a little air bled into the cabin raising the interior 
pressure. So I've run the same exact motors in both air and oil. I cannot 
tell the slightest difference. They seem to have exactly the same power, and 
even make exactly the same sound. In retrospect, I wish I'd measured the current 
draw so I could compare that, but I'm afraid it's too late. Either method works 
just fine. 
  
  
thanks, 
 Alec 
  
  
The contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are the named addressee or an authorized designee, you may not copy or use it, or disclose it to anyone else. If you received it in error please notify us immediately and then destroy it.
  
If I were to do it again I would also go with a Minkota 
or similar for me thrusters.  I built mine from standard DC 
motors.  They're ambient pressure inside and have ceramic shaft 
seals.  It was a lot to go through and not cheep when all was done.  
The worse is the weight of them.   
  
Speed controllers aren't really necessary on fractional 
horse powered thrusters like side thrusters because of the mass of the 
sub.  It doesn't react fast.  Just pulsing them on and off is 
sufficient.  Where I do recommend a speed controller is on the rear 
thruster so you can slowly cruse, skimming the bottom.  
  
Has anyone done any experimenting with oil filling 
thrusters to determine if there is an increase in electrical current draw or 
reduction in thrust do to the drag of the swirling oil and maybe some floating 
of the brushes?  
  
Dan H. 
  
  
  
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 5:05 AM 
  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side 
  Thruster Options 
  
  
  Hi Brent 
  I am also planning on using Min Kota 's on my K350 I am 
  also thinking of splitting my front mbt for better view of my hydraulic 
  manipulator you got any thoughts. 
  All the best  
  glen south Africa 
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:23 
    AM 
    Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side Thruster 
    Options 
    
 
 
  Greetings James,
  I'm also planning 
    on installing small mostly off the shelf thrusters on the sides of my K boat 
    to reduce drag and simplify things.  I've been planning on using 36 
    volt Minn Kota 101 saltwater thrusters, like Frank, and I believe Vance are 
    using and oil compensate them.  Last I checked those thruster were 
    running $250 each with the speed controllers going for  $150 
    each.  
  I'll have to check my notes, but I believe Karl Stanley 
    is using 6 of the 36 volt Minn Kota saltwater thruster that he has oil 
    compensated, and has used down to 2500 fsw.  Two for vertical thrust 
    and four in the stern. Are you expecting to go that deep James. ;}
  I 
    like the idea of using the existing flexible shafts on some motors that Alec 
    mentioned. I expected that I would clamp mine on in a similar manor as Frank 
    has done, since I'm not sure of the long term saltwater durability of my 
    favorite brand of duck tape.
  I see the need to beef up the side thru 
    hulls, and was planning on looking closely at how Dan beefed his up. With 
    the new tangle guard configuration I'm planning, I don't expect the 
    thrusters will sustain any real damage unless the Euronaut or the like plays 
    to rough with my sub.
  Regards, Szybowski
 
 
 
  > Subject: RE: 
    [PSUBS-MAILIST] Subdate > Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:46:21 
    -0400 > From: Alec.Smyth@compuware.com > To: 
    personal_submersibles@psubs.org >  > Hi James, >  > 
    1. Do people just buy the standard Minn Kota outboard motor complete > 
    with the bracket, leg, controls, handle, battery etc and just modify 
    the > motor part? or can you get just the motor and prop on its 
    own? >  > AS: You can buy just the parts you need cheaper than 
    the whole thing, I > recommend www.trollingmotorparts.com. > 
     >  > 2. Whats the through hull design? A straight forward twin 
    O ring > through hull on the outboard shaft? >  > AS: I 
    would not go with the standard pipe because it just isn't strong. > In 
    fact some motors come with plastic pipes designed to be flexible so > 
    the shaft bends when you hit something, rather than break off. On 
    the > side thrusters, I've got heavy through-hulls. I did use the 
    stock pipe > on the stern thruster, because that one doesn't go 
    through the hull. The > through-hulls are just a SS bar stock with an 
    external shoulder to > prevent the thing from being pushed in, and 
    bored to whatever minimum > inside diameter you need for the cables 
    and potting. Do not just pot the > cables, you have to put in solid 
    conductors so the pressure doesn't wick > along the cable strands. I'd 
    recommend machining some vice flats on the > through-hull too, for the 
    day you need to unscrew a thruster that's been > on there a few years. 
     >  >  > 3. Compensation. Oil, ambient air pressure 
    regulator? > I've had both but like oil compensation the best because 
    it's the > simplest (not a single moving part). I just changed the oil 
    a couple of > days ago. I expected it to be laden with carbon 
    deposits, but it came > out looking like new despite being in there 
    for 4 years. Admittedly I > put very few hours on the sub, but it 
    still surprised me that the oil > came out looking as clear as the day 
    it went in. And yes, it WAS oil not > water that came out... > 
     > :) >  > Alec
  
    
    
  
    
  No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG - 
    www.avg.com  Version: 8.0.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release 
    Date: 06/11/09 05:53:00
    
 
 |