| 
 Vance 
try classmates.com for a few 
pic     with Leslie 
Katschor           
  ----- Original Message -----  
  
  
  Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 4:25 PM 
  Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side 
  Thruster Options 
  
  Where I can't go anymore, 
  unfortunately. Vance
 
  -----Original Message----- From: marki 
  katschor <lesmarki@triton.net> To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org Sent: 
  Sun, Jun 14, 2009 3:51 pm Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side Thruster 
  Options
  
  
  
        HI Brent, i put the 
  pictures on psubs projects.  Les K 
  
    ----- Original Message -----  
    
    
    Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 3:35 
    PM 
    Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side 
    Thruster Options 
    
 
 
  Hi  Les,   I'll be interested in seeing 
    your pictures, and take some of your seals arrangement as well if you get a 
    chance.   I read about the Captain 
    retrieving his K-250 that he lost to the locker when the dome pooped out, by 
    attaching a short length of garden hose to the open snorkel valve and then 
    have the hose go to the bottom of the sub while he was in SCUBA gear. Then 
    he released the drop weight and opened a valve just a crack from the high 
    pressure air system and got out and had to quickly close and clamp the hatch 
    shut to make the sub drain and resurface. I don't remember George talking 
    about filling the MBTs with air from the high pressure tanks or from a free 
    flowing SCUBA regulator outside the sub, and under the tanks. If he had then 
    wouldn't of needed to release the drop weight to make up for any 
    remaining water in the sub not being completely siphoned 
    out.   From what I read, I think the 
    sub was in less then forty feet of water, so I'm not sure why he didn't 
    just stay in the sub while it was draining, move the hose around to get 
    almost all the water out, fill the MBT's, then completely drain the VBT and 
    surface without dropping the drop weight.  If need be he could surface 
    at a controlled rate for decompression stops using the VBT and/or thrusters 
    in the vertical position.   I was wanting a way to easily 
    and completely drain the sub without having a tube running down to the 
    bottom if possible, or having a basic valve sticking up just above the very 
    bottom of the sub, meaning that there would be water left in the sub after 
    draining down to the top of the valve.   Carsten and/or Emile, how many 
    PSI above external water pressure do you expect for it take 
    for the type of spring you have on your large over pressure 
    plate valve on the KSS to open?
 
  Regards, Szybowski
 
 
    > 
    From: lesmarki@triton.net > 
    To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side Thruster Options > Date: Sat, 13 Jun 
    2009 20:19:02 -0400 >  > the snorkel valve is all you need, if 
    you do build up pressure you have to  > let it out very slow or you 
    get a headache for a few weeks,,I know, been  > there done that,. I'm 
    uploading some pictures of my new sub project. Made a  > test piece 
    for the seals in my dogs for the hatch and motor swivels. test to  > 
    50psi no leeks with the u-block seal,,same seal in hydraulic hose's. making 
     > rear MBT, same as last sub, easy build-nice shape, 3 days at the 
    most.Going  > to cut my trolling motor controls to fit in a box, 2 
    side by side and make  > levers just like the gear shifters for a twin 
    screw boat. > The more that gets done the excitement mounts-hope to be 
    in the water at  > the end of summer, you can't buy lead in this state 
    anymore so I'm  > collecting dead batteries. any thought's . Les 
    K >  > ----- Original Message -----  > From: <MerlinSub@t-online.de> > 
    To: <personal_submersibles@psubs.org> > 
    Sent: Saturday, June 13, 2009 7:00 PM > Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] 
    Side Thruster Options >  >  > It will not work as over 
    pressure vale.. >  > vbr Carsten >  > "Brent 
    Hartwig" <brenthartwig@hotmail.com> 
    schrieb: > > > > > > > > Hello 
    Alec, > > > > Your reminded me of one reason I didn't wish 
    to go with air compensated  > > thrusters. It was a slow bleed into 
    the interior of a K-250 that George  > > was running, that made the 
    hatch dome pop out when he started to ascend,  > > and he was lucky 
    to of survived. This is also why I plan to install a over  > > 
    pressure valve much like the larger one that is installed on the KSS. 
     > > Except I'll be mounting mine in the bottom of the sub so it 
    can also be  > > used to drain the sub after a wet exit training 
    exercise. > > > > > > > > 
    Regards, > > Szybowski > > > > > 
    > > > > > Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side Thruster 
    Options > > Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 09:14:20 -0400 > > 
    From: Alec.Smyth@compuware.com > 
    > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    > > > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > 
    > > > I recall a past thread in the past on this topic, 
    it > > must be in the archives. Mine were air compensated when I 
    bought Snoopy  > > but > > I switched to oil because the 
    way the air compensation was originally > > implemented, a little 
    air bled into the cabin raising the interior > > pressure. So I've 
    run the same exact motors in both air and oil. I cannot > > tell 
    the slightest difference. They seem to have exactly the same power,  > 
    > and > > even make exactly the same sound. In retrospect, I 
    wish I'd measured the  > > current > > draw so I could 
    compare that, but I'm afraid it's too late. Either method  > > 
    works > > just fine. > > > > > > 
    thanks, > > > > Alec > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > > > > The 
    contents of this e-mail are intended for the named addressee only. It 
     > > contains information that may be confidential. Unless you are 
    the named  > > addressee or an authorized designee, you may not 
    copy or use it, or  > > disclose it to anyone else. If you received 
    it in error please notify us  > > immediately and then destroy 
    it. > > > > > > From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    > [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] 
    On Behalf Of Dan > > H. > > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 
    8:08 AM > > To: > > personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    > Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side > > Thruster Options > 
    > > > > > > > If I were to do it again I would 
    also go with a Minkota > > or similar for me thrusters. I built 
    mine from standard DC > > motors. They're ambient pressure inside 
    and have ceramic shaft > > seals. It was a lot to go through and 
    not cheep when all was done. > > The worse is the weight of 
    them. > > > > Speed controllers aren't really necessary on 
    fractional > > horse powered thrusters like side thrusters because 
    of the mass of the > > sub. It doesn't react fast. Just pulsing 
    them on and off is > > sufficient. Where I do recommend a speed 
    controller is on the rear > > thruster so you can slowly cruse, 
    skimming the bottom. > > > > Has anyone done any 
    experimenting with oil filling > > thrusters to determine if there 
    is an increase in electrical current draw  > > or > > 
    reduction in thrust do to the drag of the swirling oil and maybe some 
     > > floating > > of the brushes? > > > 
    > Dan H. > > > > > > > > > > 
    ----- Original Message -----  > > From: > > glen > 
    > brown > > To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    > > > Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 5:05 AM > > Subject: 
    Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side > > Thruster Options > > > 
    > > > Hi Brent > > I am also planning on using Min Kota 
    's on my K350 I am > > also thinking of splitting my front mbt for 
    better view of my hydraulic > > manipulator you got any 
    thoughts. > > All the best > > glen south Africa > 
    > > > ----- Original Message -----  > > From: > 
    > Brent Hartwig > > To: PSUBSorg > > Sent: Friday, June 
    12, 2009 12:23 > > AM > > Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Side 
    Thruster > > Options > > > > > > > 
    > Greetings James, > > > > I'm also planning > 
    > on installing small mostly off the shelf thrusters on the sides of my 
     > > K boat > > to reduce drag and simplify things. I've 
    been planning on using 36 > > volt Minn Kota 101 saltwater 
    thrusters, like Frank, and I believe  > > Vance are > > 
    using and oil compensate them. Last I checked those thruster were > 
    > running $250 each with the speed controllers going for $150 > 
    > each. > > > > I'll have to check my notes, but I 
    believe Karl Stanley > > is using 6 of the 36 volt Minn Kota 
    saltwater thruster that he has oil > > compensated, and has used 
    down to 2500 fsw. Two for vertical thrust > > and four in the 
    stern. Are you expecting to go that deep James. ;} > > > > 
    I > > like the idea of using the existing flexible shafts on some 
    motors  > > that Alec > > mentioned. I expected that I 
    would clamp mine on in a similar manor as  > > Frank > > 
    has done, since I'm not sure of the long term saltwater durability of 
     > > my > > favorite brand of duck tape. > 
    > > > I see the need to beef up the side thru > > 
    hulls, and was planning on looking closely at how Dan beefed his up. 
     > > With > > the new tangle guard configuration I'm 
    planning, I don't expect the > > thrusters will sustain any real 
    damage unless the Euronaut or the like  > > plays > > to 
    rough with my sub. > > > > Regards, > > 
    Szybowski > > > > > > > > > > 
    > Subject: RE: > > [PSUBS-MAILIST] Subdate > > > 
    Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:46:21 > > -0400 > > > From: 
    Alec.Smyth@compuware.com > 
    > > To: > > personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
    > > > > > Hi James, > > > > > 
    > > > 1. Do people just buy the standard Minn Kota outboard 
    motor complete > > > > > with the bracket, leg, 
    controls, handle, battery etc and just modify > > the > > 
    > motor part? or can you get just the motor and prop on its > > 
    own? > > > > > > AS: You can buy just the parts you 
    need cheaper than > > the whole thing, I > > > 
    recommend www.trollingmotorparts.com. > > > > 
    > > > > > > > 2. Whats the through hull design? A 
    straight forward twin > > O ring > > > through hull on 
    the outboard shaft? > > > > > > AS: I > > 
    would not go with the standard pipe because it just isn't strong. > 
    > > In > > fact some motors come with plastic pipes designed 
    to be flexible so > > > > > the shaft bends when you 
    hit something, rather than break off. On > > the > > > 
    side thrusters, I've got heavy through-hulls. I did use the > > 
    stock pipe > > > on the stern thruster, because that one doesn't 
    go > > through the hull. The > > > through-hulls are 
    just a SS bar stock with an > > external shoulder to > > 
    > prevent the thing from being pushed in, and > > bored to 
    whatever minimum > > > inside diameter you need for the 
    cables > > and potting. Do not just pot the > > > 
    cables, you have to put in solid > > conductors so the pressure 
    doesn't wick > > > along the cable strands. I'd > > 
    recommend machining some vice flats on the > > > through-hull 
    too, for the > > day you need to unscrew a thruster that's 
    been > > > on there a few years. > > > > 
    > > > > > > > 3. Compensation. Oil, ambient air 
    pressure > > regulator? > > > I've had both but like 
    oil compensation the best because > > it's the > > > 
    simplest (not a single moving part). I just changed the oil > > a 
    couple of > > > days ago. I expected it to be laden with 
    carbon > > deposits, but it came > > > out looking like 
    new despite being in there > > for 4 years. Admittedly I > 
    > > put very few hours on the sub, but it > > still surprised 
    me that the oil > > > came out looking as clear as the 
    day > > it went in. And yes, it WAS oil not > > > water 
    that came out... > > > > > > > > :) > 
    > > > > > Alec > > > > > 
    > > > > > > > > > > 
    > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > 
    Checked by AVG - > > www.avg.com > > Version: 8.0.339 / Virus 
    Database: 270.12.63/2169 - Release > > Date: 06/11/09 
    05:53:00 > > > > > > >  >  > 
     >  > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal > 
    CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database > 
    because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive 
    messages > from our organization. >  > If you want to be 
    removed from this mailing list simply click on the > link below or 
    send a blank email message to: > removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
     > Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by 
    an > automated process and should be complete within five minutes 
    of > our server receiving your request. >  > 
    PSUBS.ORG > PO Box 53 > Weare, NH 03281 > 
    603-529-1100 > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
     >  >  >  >  >  > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal > 
    CAN-SPAM Act of 2003. Your email address appears in our database > 
    because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive 
    messages > from our organization. >  > If you want to be 
    removed from this mailing list simply click on the > link below or 
    send a blank email message to: > removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org > 
     > Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by 
    an > automated process and should be complete within five minutes 
    of > our server receiving your request. >  > 
    PSUBS.ORG > PO Box 53 > Weare, NH 03281 > 
    603-529-1100 > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    ************************************************************************ > 
    
   
   
 |