[PSUBS-MAILIST] Water jets

Marc de Piolenc via Personal_Submersibles personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Sun Oct 26 20:24:30 EDT 2014


A blythe generalization that is essentially meaningless.

As Pazmany used to say: poot some nombers to it!

Marc

On 10/27/2014 3:50 AM, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles wrote:

> Also I did a bit of research on jet propulsion a couple of weeks back
> & what I read said it was inefficient compared to conventional propulsion.
> Alan
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Alec Smyth via Personal_Submersibles
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> *To:* Personal Submersibles General Discussion
> <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 27, 2014 8:11 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Water jets
>
> I don't think water jets are necessarily inefficient, but if there is
> considerable piping around of the water before it exits through the
> jets, that's what I was referring to. However, even that was not meant
> as criticism, it is just a normal trade-off. It is surely less efficient
> than a conventional direct-coupled prop, but you also get
> entanglement-resistance and maneuverability.
>
>
>
> On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 10:11 AM, Marc de Piolenc via
> Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org
> <mailto:personal_submersibles at psubs.org>> wrote:
>
>     There is nothing inherently inefficient about waterjets. There are
>     commercial fast ferries using them and getting very good thrust per
>     horsepower - better than any supercavitating propeller could do at
>     the same speed, certainly.
>
>     Lousy design will of course produce poor results, and jets are much
>     less amenable to rule-of-thumb construction than open propellers.
>     But whether it is "well known" or not, good design will produce good
>     results.
>
>     Marc de Piolenc
>
>     On 10/26/2014 8:41 PM, hank pronk via Personal_Submersibles wrote:
>
>
>         Graham,
>         In the world of marine jet drive it is well known that jet drive
>         takes two times the horse power to do the same job.  Jet drive
>         is well suited to a craft that needs a shallow draft.  I think
>         you will find it very complicated to control and it will be very
>         inefficient. I have been down this road, I love the concept but
>         abandoned it.  If you go forward may I suggest you start with a
>         jet drive.  It is not a simple part to replicate.  The impeller
>         tolerances are critical.  I have a jet unit on the shelf I could
>         donate to your project.  The jet is from a jet ski. I would
>         consider a single rear motor on a full gimbal.
>         Hank ------------------------------__--------------
>         On Sun, 10/26/14, Graham Bayliss via Personal_Submersibles
>         <personal_submersibles at psubs.__org
>         <mailto:personal_submersibles at psubs.org>> wrote:
>
>            Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] (no subject)
>            To: "'Personal Submersibles General Discussion'"
>         <personal_submersibles at psubs.__org
>         <mailto:personal_submersibles at psubs.org>>
>            Received: Sunday, October 26, 2014, 7:39 AM
>
>            #yiv9417249292
>            #yiv9417249292 --
>
>             _filtered #yiv9417249292 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
>             _filtered #yiv9417249292 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:__2 15
>            5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
>            #yiv9417249292
>            #yiv9417249292 p.yiv9417249292MsoNormal, #yiv9417249292
>            li.yiv9417249292MsoNormal, #yiv9417249292
>            div.yiv9417249292MsoNormal
>                  {margin:0cm;margin-bottom:.__0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}
>            #yiv9417249292 a:link, #yiv9417249292
>            span.yiv9417249292MsoHyperlink
>                  {color:blue;text-decoration:__underline;}
>            #yiv9417249292 a:visited, #yiv9417249292
>            span.__yiv9417249292MsoHyperlinkFollo__wed
>                  {color:purple;text-decoration:__underline;}
>            #yiv9417249292 span.yiv9417249292EmailStyle17
>                  {color:#1F497D;}
>            #yiv9417249292 .yiv9417249292MsoChpDefault
>                  {}
>             _filtered #yiv9417249292 {margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt
>            72.0pt;}
>            #yiv9417249292 div.yiv9417249292WordSection1
>                  {}
>            #yiv9417249292  Hi   I am near the end of my build
>            of my k350 and have started to look at new designs I am
>            interested in building a flyer sub and have come up with a
>            design which will include a vectored motor drive this will
>            enable my flyer to hover and stop where ever I want. I have
>            designed a motor unit which will drive a fan type propeller
>            as an intake this will force water to the rear of the unit
>             where it is compressed  then it is forced into ducting
>            which will take  the water to four nozzles on the side of
>            the craft. The nozzles are able to turn three hundred and
>            sixty degrees  both side are independent of one another so
>            rolls will be achievable. The reason for a vectored motor is
>            you only need one motor source and one power pack this will
>            ease the maintenance and increase the enjoyment of using
>            your sub. I am interested in the clubs thought of this kind
>            of design.  Graham
>
>            -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>            _________________________________________________
>            Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>         Personal_Submersibles at psubs.__org
>         <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org>
>         http://www.psubs.org/mailman/__listinfo.cgi/personal___submersibles
>         <http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles>
>
>
>         _________________________________________________
>         Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>         Personal_Submersibles at psubs.__org
>         <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org>
>         http://www.psubs.org/mailman/__listinfo.cgi/personal___submersibles
>         <http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles>
>
>
>     --
>     Archivale catalog: http://www.archivale.com/__catalog
>     <http://www.archivale.com/catalog>
>     Polymath weblog: http://www.archivale.com/__weblog
>     <http://www.archivale.com/weblog>
>     Translations (ProZ profile): http://www.proz.com/profile/__639380
>     <http://www.proz.com/profile/639380>
>     Translations (BeWords profile):
>     http://www.bewords.com/Marc-__dePiolenc
>     <http://www.bewords.com/Marc-dePiolenc>
>     Ducted fans: http://massflow.archivale.com/
>     _________________________________________________
>     Personal_Submersibles mailing list
>     Personal_Submersibles at psubs.__org
>     <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org>
>     http://www.psubs.org/mailman/__listinfo.cgi/personal___submersibles
>     <http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org <mailto:Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org>
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Personal_Submersibles mailing list
> Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
> http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles
>

-- 
Archivale catalog: http://www.archivale.com/catalog
Polymath weblog: http://www.archivale.com/weblog
Translations (ProZ profile): http://www.proz.com/profile/639380
Translations (BeWords profile): http://www.bewords.com/Marc-dePiolenc
Ducted fans: http://massflow.archivale.com/


More information about the Personal_Submersibles mailing list