[PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock

Alan James via Personal_Submersibles personal_submersibles at psubs.org
Wed Mar 2 15:19:54 EST 2016


Sean,why not leave the transducer in the 1 atm compartment & just attach itto the pipe from the compressor that would run through the wall to the variouscompartments & sealing flanges. There are of course other complications withreleasing the vacuum pressure on the individual hatches.Alan


      From: Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 To: Personal Submersibles General Discussion <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 8:35 AM
 Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock
   
It is not the personnel transfer hatch that presents the problem, but rather the egress hatches in the lockout chamber, as those flanges will see the lockout pressure in normal operation.  I can get away with a larger range pressure transducer for those hatches, but then I lose measurement resolution.Sean


On March 2, 2016 9:32:49 AM MST, Alan James via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> wrote:
Sean,that sounds a good idea. Nuytco set the o-ring on the deep worker hatch externally with a vacuumpump, but with your twin seal idea you could do this from within the sub without decreasing the hull pressure.  If the transducers are just monitoring the vacuum between the o-rings can't the transducer bem! ountedon the 1atm side of the diver lockout hatch & not be exposed to diver lockout pressure?Alan


     From: Sean T. Stevenson via Personal_Submersibles <personal_submersibles at psubs.org>
 To: "personal_submersibles at psubs.org" <personal_submersibles at psubs.org> 
 Sent: Thursday, March 3, 2016 1:41 AM
 Subject: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Hatch interlock
   
Doing some further design on my lockout submersible project, I came up with a novel way to implement hatch interlocks, which doubles as a seal condition monitor, and a means of establishing a preliminary seal in the absence of a pressure differential without relying on the hatch dogs to p! rovidethe initial o-ring squeeze.My design entails two o-rings per hatch (vessel has six hatches: cabin loading / escape, outer lockout loading / escape, inner lockout loading / escape, inner lockout egress , outer lockout egress, and transfer). These o-rings are concentric face seals, each residing within a half dovetail groove for positive retention of each o-ring when the hatch is opened or manipulated. The grooves are oriented such that the flat face of each half dovetail faces the intermediate space between the two rings. This intermediate volume is not isolated, but rather connected (on the sealing flange side) to a vacuum transducer, and piped through appropriate valving to a vacuum pump. When the hatch is closed, this intermediate space is pulled to vacuum (as strongly as the pump allows), then locked off, and the strength of this vacuum is measured by the transducer and continuously monitored. The interlock is clear as long as the vacuum holds, a! ndactivates the moment the seal is rele! ased,instead of relying on some arbitrary movement of the hatch to indicate that it is open.Apart from the obvious expense, I see a potential problem with exposing those vacuum transducers in the lockout hatches to high pressure, necessitating either a less sensitive transducer that will withstand the pressure, or some means of isolating the transducer when the pressure approaches the limit of its range - I'm still working this out in my head, but I thought I would share anyway.Sean

_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles


   
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles


_______________________________________________
Personal_Submersibles mailing list
Personal_Submersibles at psubs.org
http://www.psubs.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/personal_submersibles


  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.whoweb.com/pipermail/personal_submersibles/attachments/20160302/bc2eb4dd/attachment.html>


More information about the Personal_Submersibles mailing list