[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Most accurate Hunley model.



No Brian. Jim has asked me a valid question and I was HAPPY to answer it. I was after all vindicated
in my Hunley conceptual beliefs by a Hunley archaeologist. So instead of checking the psubs archives,
check the link I sent Jim and read what the Hunley archaeologist answered in response to my conceptual
questions regarding the Hunley. That will clear things up REAL fast, whereas our archives only shows naysayers
arguing and disparaging me. It was very nice to be correct on this one. But I am not always. I have made mistakes
posting here before. But yes, being vindicated on this one was VERY satisfactory to me. It was also educational
for the psubs group in that it showed not to disparage someone's concepts unless you can disprove them, and
also taught the group that the Hunley was in fact a hybrid of ambient and 1atm operation as I always said she was.
 
Bill Akins...the "candlewaster".
 
 
 
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: Brian Cox
Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 12:13 AM
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Most accurate Hunley model.

Oh no,  I'm getting that "sinking" feeling again ;)    Maybe just check the archives on that one Jim !
 
Brian
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, February 03, 2006 20:31
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Most accurate Hunley model.

Thanks for the link, Bill.  A very stylish model indeed! 
 
You know, I racall a discussion here about the Hunley some months ago, but I lost track of it.  Tell me, are you still of the opinion that the Hunley was a hybrid ambient submarine?  How was that concept received by others in the group?
 
Cheers!
 
Jim