[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Product liability?



Bill

 

I to was attempting humour, the last line giving that away.

 

Stephen

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Akins
Sent:
Thursday, 23 February 2006 9:51 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Product liability?

 

Ok Stephen.

 

Although we do call them a "bouncing betty" here, I was actually pulling your leg about that (a joke) and it was the smallest of the 2 points I was making.

The larger of the two seems to have skipped right over down under. Lol.

Bill Akins.

 

 

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 4:28 AM

Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Product liability?

 

Bill

 

With respect I served in the Australian Army for 4 years and that’s what ‘we’ call them. You may remember we also went to war in “NARM” and Malaysia with the Pom’s (people you would call British). One must not assume that the same things have the same names across the globe!

 

If I may provide some examples:

 

The rest of the world, Petrol or Petroleum – The US, Gas!

Australia, Mate – US, Buddy or Pal

Australia, Sheila – US, Girl friend

Australia, Prawn - US, Shrimp

Australia, Utility – US, Pickup Truck (by the way we invented that one even though you think you did)

Germany, U-boat – US, Submarine

 

I do agree that Betty is a better name though because who else but a female would want to blow your nuts and pecker off.

 

Regards

 

Stephen Pearce

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Akins
Sent:
Thursday, 23 February 2006 6:42 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Product liability?

 

Ahem, that's a bouncing "BETTY" Stephen. Get your bomb nomenclature correct will ya? Lol.

 

But seriously guys....Even if Carsten wasn't joking about having Euronaut set up to not work correctly if someone stole her

that was unfamiliar with her, that would not make Carsten responsible or liable for their death. I think what Carsten was saying

was not that he has rigged a bobby trap for a thief, but rather that there are certain procedures and operations of the boat that

the thief would not know that would sink him on the first dive. Now just because a thief who stole the Euronaut killed himself

because he didn't know how to run Carsten's boat does not make Carsten liable for that thief's death. I equate what Carsten was

saying to say....someone who owns their own private jet. Now suspose some young thief who knew how to fly a piper cub stole

this private executive jet and killed himself in a crash because he did not know the procedure to operate the jet correctly. Not the jet

owner's fault now is it? If there happened to be a switch or valve that was in an out of the way place that the thief did not see, that is not

Carsten's fault or responsibility. It is not the responsibility of the boat owner to leave an operators manual and precise instructions on

how to operate a boat for the convience of the thief. No one makes them steal. If they kill themselves due to non sufficient knowledge

of the vehicle they were operating, that is their fault alone and the law would rule that way as well.

Bill Akins.

 

 

----- Original Message -----

Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2006 12:20 AM

Subject: RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Product liability?

 

Jim

 

Maybe Euronaut should be called “Miss Saigon” in view of its booby traps. I wonder if it’s fitted with a Trip Wire and Bouncing Benny J

 

Stephen Pearce