Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] More Stimulation

[Carl Kem <dustyut@lasal.net>]

Ken, I think what he's saying is that a wet sub just doesn't go to the
extremes that a dry sub can.  Like the 1 ATM you're talking about.  I
assume you're talking dry sub.  In either case, a dry sub is far safer
at 300 meters with no power than a wet sub is, PERIOD.  If a wet sub
gets you that far, you're already fish food and the sub is a new toy for
Davy Jones.  On the other hand if you're at, let's say 20 meters, yes it
can be compared reasonably.
Carl


Subscuba@aol.com wrote:

> OK, limit it to 50 meters. Otherwise what??
>
> Ken Martindale
>
> In a message dated 2/24/01 10:28:38 AM Eastern Standard Time,
> VBra676539@aol.com writes:
>
>
>
>>
>> Now, if you want to limit the discussion to shallow water systems,
>> say 50
>> meters, then you might get some sense out of it. Not otherwise.
>>
>> Vance
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>

--
"In times like these, it helps to recall there have always been times
like these."-Paul Harvey