[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Pressure compensation - CO2 vs Air



Something to keep in mind when using CO2 for pressure compensation:  gaseous CO2 when combined with the humidity expected to be found in a submersible and it’s components forms carbonic acid so you will see accelerated corrosion of metal surfaces and electronic/electrical components will be rapidly degraded.  Nitrogen or air is a better choice…air should be easier to obtain and will cost less.  Remember KISS!

 

Another choice is to oil fill the motors, mineral oil is often used or some other dielectric oil (preferable non-explosive) can be substituted.  This reduces the number of systems required to operate your submersible and thus decrease the probability of failure.  Plus it doesn’t require any internal or external space.

 

A good set of hard or soft mechanical seals negates the need for any of this.

 

Respectfully,

Jay K. Jeffries

Andros Is., Bahamas

 

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
  -
Aristotle

 

 

 

 


From: owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org [mailto:owner-personal_submersibles@psubs.org] On Behalf Of Recon1st@aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 10:37 PM
To: personal_submersibles@psubs.org
Subject: Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] Pressure compensation - CO2 vs Air

 

In a message dated 10/17/2006 3:42:53 PM Central Daylight Time, gslaterp@hotmail.com writes:

Co2 Liquifies at about 750psi at room temperature

thanks George will keep it on the maybe list. I was also thinking about the

cooling atributes as it would be vented off. Seems every time i would vent

to lower pressure some cooling would happen, cool electric motors I know

is good.

 

Was thinking of using it in the lead acid battery compartment for the

1 atm in there, to reduce chance of ignitions.