[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PSUBS-MAILIST] radar



Well Dan, I think it is necessary to point out that, while the vast majority of
us can not afford to undertake large scale projects like the Euronaut, the
defining factor that makes a sub a Psub is not its size, but rather the fact
that it is a non-commercial venture undertaken by a hobbyist.  That said, there
certainly are boats out there which are designed to operate untended, by virtue
of having the capabilities normally relegated to surface support - sufficient
power, range, endurance, weather handling ability, communications, crew comfort,
collision regs compliance, etc.  Unless I am mistaken, the Euronaut falls into
this category.  (I'll leave it to Carsten to comment further).  Such a sub would
likely be of sufficient size to accomodate outfitting it in accordance with the
equipment normally carried on surface vessels - and be capable of supporting a
superstructure that can get a radar scanner high enough to be useful.  My design
is a design exercise only, but it is of a larger vessel with design criteria
including sufficient freeboard to maintain a weather deck large enough to
accomodate an evacuation via stretcher lift (one person lying down, tended by
one or two more), and a weight buoyancy statement which will, with all tanks
empty, maintain stability with the entire ship's complement (6) on the weather
deck in a reasonable sea state - this is in case of fire or other event which
necessitates evacuating to the deck, in the surfaced condition.  The point being
that for most smaller psubs, you're probably right, but there is a place in the
psub universe for vessels designed to cruise on the surface, and in this
context, radar is not a bad idea.

-Sean


Quoting "Dan H." <jmachine@adelphia.net>:

> Is RADAR really necessary?
> 
> First of all, it's not the smartest thing to operate a P size sub without
> some surface support out there with you.  If you feel you need radar, that's
> the place for it.
> 
> Second, a P-sub is way to close to the surface of the water for radar to see
> very far.  Unless there is fog, in which case it's highly unlikely you'd be
> out there anyway, just a few feet off the surface I can see as far by eye as
> a radar can. 
>  
> There are better places to spend the budgeted money of a P-subber.
> 
> Just my opinion,
> Dan H.





************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The personal submersibles mailing list complies with the US Federal
CAN-SPAM Act of 2003.  Your email address appears in our database
because either you, or someone you know, requested you receive messages
from our organization.

If you want to be removed from this mailing list simply click on the
link below or send a blank email message to:
	removeme-personal_submersibles@psubs.org

Removal of your email address from this mailing list occurs by an
automated process and should be complete within five minutes of
our server receiving your request.

PSUBS.ORG
PO Box 311
Weare, NH  03281
603-529-1100
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
************************************************************************